[Majorityrights Central] Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part three Posted by Guessedworker on Sunday, 27 August 2023 00:25. [Majorityrights Central] A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity’s origin Posted by Guessedworker on Tuesday, 25 July 2023 22:19. [Majorityrights Central] On an image now lost: Part 2 Posted by Guessedworker on Saturday, 15 February 2025 14:21. [Majorityrights News] Richard Williamson, 8th March 1940 - 29th January 2025 Posted by Guessedworker on Monday, 03 February 2025 10:30. [Majorityrights Central] Freedom’s actualisation and a debased coin: Part 2 Posted by Guessedworker on Saturday, 11 January 2025 01:08. [Majorityrights News] KP interview with James Gilmore, former diplomat and insider from first Trump administration Posted by Guessedworker on Sunday, 05 January 2025 00:35. [Majorityrights Central] Aletheia shakes free her golden locks at The Telegraph Posted by Guessedworker on Saturday, 04 January 2025 23:06. [Majorityrights News] Former Putin economic advisor on Putin’s global strategy Posted by Guessedworker on Monday, 30 December 2024 15:40. [Majorityrights News] Trump will ‘arm Ukraine to the teeth’ if Putin won’t negotiate ceasefire Posted by Guessedworker on Tuesday, 12 November 2024 16:20. [Majorityrights News] Olukemi Olufunto Adegoke Badenoch wins Tory leadership election Posted by Guessedworker on Saturday, 02 November 2024 22:56. [Majorityrights News] What can the Ukrainian ammo storage hits achieve? Posted by Guessedworker on Saturday, 21 September 2024 22:55. [Majorityrights Central] An Ancient Race In The Myths Of Time Posted by James Bowery on Wednesday, 21 August 2024 15:26. [Majorityrights Central] Slaying The Dragon Posted by James Bowery on Monday, 05 August 2024 15:32. [Majorityrights Central] The legacy of Southport Posted by Guessedworker on Friday, 02 August 2024 07:34. [Majorityrights News] Farage only goes down on one knee. Posted by Guessedworker on Saturday, 29 June 2024 06:55. [Majorityrights News] An educated Russian man in the street says his piece Posted by Guessedworker on Wednesday, 19 June 2024 17:27. [Majorityrights Central] Freedom’s actualisation and a debased coin: Part 1 Posted by Guessedworker on Friday, 07 June 2024 10:53. [Majorityrights News] Computer say no Posted by Guessedworker on Thursday, 09 May 2024 15:17. [Majorityrights News] Be it enacted by the people of the state of Oklahoma Posted by Guessedworker on Saturday, 27 April 2024 09:35. [Majorityrights Central] Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert Posted by Guessedworker on Sunday, 14 April 2024 10:34. [Majorityrights News] Moscow’s Bataclan Posted by Guessedworker on Friday, 22 March 2024 22:22. [Majorityrights News] Soren Renner Is Dead Posted by James Bowery on Thursday, 21 March 2024 13:50. [Majorityrights News] Collett sets the record straight Posted by Guessedworker on Thursday, 14 March 2024 17:41. [Majorityrights Central] Patriotic Alternative given the black spot Posted by Guessedworker on Thursday, 14 March 2024 17:14. [Majorityrights Central] On Spengler and the inevitable Posted by Guessedworker on Wednesday, 21 February 2024 17:33. [Majorityrights News] Alex Navalny, born 4th June, 1976; died at Yamalo-Nenets penitentiary 16th February, 2024 Posted by Guessedworker on Friday, 16 February 2024 23:43. [Majorityrights News] A Polish analysis of Moscow’s real geopolitical interests and intent Posted by Guessedworker on Tuesday, 06 February 2024 16:36. [Majorityrights Central] Things reactionaries get wrong about geopolitics and globalism Posted by Guessedworker on Wednesday, 24 January 2024 10:49. [Majorityrights News] Savage Sage, a corrective to Moscow’s flood of lies Posted by Guessedworker on Friday, 12 January 2024 14:44. [Majorityrights Central] Twilight for the gods of complacency? Posted by Guessedworker on Tuesday, 02 January 2024 10:22. [Majorityrights Central] Milleniyule 2023 Posted by Guessedworker on Friday, 22 December 2023 13:11. [Majorityrights Central] A Russian Passion Posted by Guessedworker on Friday, 22 December 2023 01:11. [Majorityrights Central] Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four Posted by Guessedworker on Saturday, 02 December 2023 00:39. [Majorityrights News] The legacy of Richard Lynn Posted by Guessedworker on Thursday, 31 August 2023 22:18. [Majorityrights Central] Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part three Posted by Guessedworker on Sunday, 27 August 2023 00:25. [Majorityrights Central] A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity’s origin Posted by Guessedworker on Tuesday, 25 July 2023 22:19. [Majorityrights Central] On an image now lost: Part 2 Posted by Guessedworker on Saturday, 15 February 2025 14:21. [Majorityrights News] Richard Williamson, 8th March 1940 - 29th January 2025 Posted by Guessedworker on Monday, 03 February 2025 10:30. Can a European people, or the greater part of it, find the Truth of itself today ... its living, unchanging ethnic person, its relational wholeness, its belonging to the land and to past, present and future? Even at this hour, filled with error and confusion and rampant wickedness as it is, can such an awakening … some might call it a rebirth … be achieved? Or sufficiently achieved to, at a minimum, preserve our existence? Those are the questions with which Part 1 of this series concluded. A century ago Germans faced another ethnic crisis – not the same as ours or so acute, but very urgent in its way. So the precedent exists. What can it teach us? Once upon a time in a land far away (or these days about 1 hr 40 min from London by passenger jet) the great mass of a defeated and despairing people gave their love and their allegiance to a messianic little man with a toothbrush moustache. They believed in him and in his power to lift the heavy moral and economic burden on them, give them inspiration, bring them light. They believed as no other European people believed before or since. But it was not an irrational belief. There were reasons for it. Among other things, he had a plan to Macht Deutschland wieder groß, and he made good on it. He spoke to the people as his people, his blood. He spoke of belonging and uniqueness, and of honour, heroism and destiny. He did it with a near religious fervour, and in an oddly histrionic but mesmerising way which gripped all who saw and heard him. It was easy to believe in the messianic image which he had himself carefully engineered over many years. Everything from his table talks to his set-piece public appearances and pronouncements was calculated and theatrical, none more so than those at the stupendous and dramatic parade ground that his party had built in Nuremberg.
On top of all that he had a highly competent Reichsministerium für Volksaufklärung und Propaganda. And his Reichsminister had a sophisticated understanding of how to sway and inspirit the Volk. The inspiriting part still hold a general truth for racially European peoples today, much-abused as we all are. But too much of what was said and done in the NSDAP years was not true at all. For example, the little man with the toothbrush moustache opined that:
Just by that choice of words we can conclude that he identified attention as the means to ethnic self-awareness, and he grasped at least something of its polarities and dynamics. Of course, he did so not as an ethnic nationalist and identitarian but as an “Aryan supremacist”, German imperialist and hammer of the Jews, each of which array negatively against someone somewhere. But, with the possible exception of Jews, a group identity which reifies and defines itself against an Other will always be distorted by some or other non-essential element. Indeed, in general sameness is a stronger reference and rallying point than difference – ask any identical twin. More specific to race and ethnicity, what is shared is stronger than what is unshared, and that is true whether we are speaking of peoplehood, genes, land or any other shared natural interest, the defence of which is always more necessitous than is the attack upon the being and interests of an Other. In other words, defensive or life-preserving interests possess a greater import and urgency than expansive or resource-acquisitional interests.
This is the second of a series of essays on liberalism’s reification of the unfettering will and nationalism’s exposition on the human reality. By liberalism I mean the ideational system derived from three and half centuries of western thought, which constitutes the organising Idea of the modern epoch and arrays politically as left and right. I do not use the term in the narrow American sense of progressive opinion. By nationalism I mean an ethnic and/or racial nationalism of our peoples’ truth, life and natural interests.
What happens when a regnant political culture of centuries standing simply loses its inner motive force? No revolution takes place. No viable replacement philosophy is to hand. Nothing on a systemic scale occurs to force the change. Yet the historical agency of this culture, which still today imbues the life experience of hundreds of millions, quite suddenly fails. The consequences are, of course, epochal. Liberalism, the system under which we westerners all live, will never deliver the “fully-human” estate of limitless freedom which its radical intellectuals and activists promised (or threatened). There will be no breaking of all the bounds. They have withstood the ravages of liberal ideology and emerged inviolable. Nature is regnant, and the tabula rasa has been falsified. Accordingly, the existential equalities which rest on it, and on total nurture, must now wither and die, for they have no surviving foundational claim. The liberal “individual”, the great raison-d’etre of the system which works through our very person, has been found out. Its never entirely reconciled twin ideologies of right and left, and therefore of libertarianism and equalitarianism, have both … both ... lost their compass. Likewise, Nature’s political revival robs universalism (after liberty and equality the third of liberalism’s four interlocking and defining principles) of its justification. In Nature’s realm there can be no brotherhood of all men because human relation is not flat and featureless, and cannot be dispatched by a faked sodality, be it liberal, be it Christian (ie, Judaic). The human reality of race and ethnicity, kinship, discrimination and belonging, and everything that flows exclusively therefrom, cannot be put away. The pharisaical attempt to turn it, in the European case alone, into “hate” and “racism” is destined for a very public repudiation. The final philosophical blow is to the fourth defining principle: progress. After the trans reversal there is no other ideological space into which liberalism can penetrate and expand. This, too, is telling. When there is no novel and exotic identity it can propose, no theoretical oppression it can confect, the whole of liberalism – essentially a conflict philosophy - loses its motive historical force. It is become like a supertanker which has put to sea with insufficient fuel for the voyage. It has forged onward through the gales and high seas. Now the great engines are rattling to a stop. One hundred thousand horsepower is reducing to nothing. Already, the vast rudder cannot be turned. The ship is dead. The crew remain at their stations because, for now at least, there is inertia in the system. Given its weight and size, the vessel will continue to cleave the waves for quite some distance. Every European life in the west will continue to be structured by the old desiderata, perhaps even for a generation – likely longer in the case of white Americans, because race gives a weaker signal than ethnicity.
Since the July general election the The Daily Telegraph has grown increasingly rebellious. The editorial stance didn’t shift further to the progressive cause, as was the case in 1997 when, after eighteen years of Tory rule, Tony Blair’s party was positively welcomed into power with palm leaves laid at its feet. No such change of tone for Kier Starmer and his hapless ministers. Indeed, not just the Labour government but the entire liberal Establishment - no doubt as embodied at The Times and The Guardian – has quickly become fair game for the newspaper formerly derided as the Torygraph. It seems that Donald’s Trump’s triumph in November has tipped the scales,and the DT’s owners and senior editors spy a radical shift in the polity and a chance for a revitalised commercial future. Never has this been more apparent than today when the online site has overdosed on moral outrage at the decades-long political complicity with, and inaction against, Muslim child prostitution gangs. One should, of course, bear in mind that prior to this the DT has had little interesting to say about the scandal. It was The Times chief investigative reporter Andrew Norfolk who broke the omerta with coverage of the crimes committed in Rotherham. The Times, it has to be said, has fallen silent on the scandal now; as the DT was until now. But better late than never, the DT has published a clutch of pieces - at least five - in the wake of Labour Minister Jess Phillips’ rejection yesterday of a national public enquiry into events in the Lancashire town of Oldham. One of the articles, which are all pay-walled, actually uses the term anti-white racism to describe the actions of authority. That would have earned a DT commenter an instant ban not so long ago. But now the native cat is out of the bag, and it won’t be put back. The nationalist cat will be looking to follow! The most impressive of the articles is titled How the grooming gangs scandal was covered up. It is a joint effort by Sam Ashworth-Hayes, a leader writer and business columnist at the DT, and Charlie Peters, a National Reporter at GB News – a cooperation which itself shows the direction of travel at the DT. The article is the best piece of journalism on the subject that I have seen for years. It concludes with the following excoriating sentiments:
The political techtonics are shifting beneath the feet of the liberal Establishment. The age of lies is coming to an end.
The screenwriter who penned “an ancient race” marking “Once Upon A Time In The West” as mythic Requiem For Man, died a week ago.
To my cousins in England from an American Orange Man, the deep history of your manhood you feel needs this perspective to guide your actions. I offer my body as your Sovereign to be sacrificed by you my people if you will but take heed and follow this lead.
Southport was a trigger. So now a prediction.
We nationalists have a lot to say about many things. But the freedom of the individual is not generally one of them. We do, of course, necessarily reject the liberal philosophy as the ruling Idea of our age. Famously “beyond left and right”, nationalism exists in a state of permanent and total hostility to it, which posture is fully reciprocated by the liberal Establishment. In consequence, our focus is only really group-based. That natural and inevitable individuality which so characterises our race becomes altogether too much identified with the liberal pursuit of individual-ism, and all possibility of a fitting identitarian paradigm is lost. One can’t help but wonder whether, in consequence, our politics is fatally weakened and incomplete. That said, let us agree that human freedom is a lodestar of the mind, and a primary value of the European mind and thus the European sociobiology. Obviously, there is no denying the uplifting and inspiring effect of its clarion call. Of course, there are clarion calls and clarion calls. At the ethnic and/or national level, the principles of independence (ie, a negative freedom) and autonomy (positive) are valid even when, at an intermediate, constitutional level, principles such as pluralism (negative) and democracy (positive) are absent. At both levels (ie, national and constitutional), the various principles are valid even when, at the level of the individual man or woman, personal liberties are absent. A captive or slave society might, therefore, still be ethnically and/or nationally independent and autonomous. Equally it might be, to a greater or lesser extent, pluralist and democratic. Even while Stalin’s Terror was in full flood, elections were held to the Supreme Soviet of the Soviet Union. From this we may ascertain that, notwithstanding all the noise that national liberation struggles create, and the noise about “liberal democracy”, secret ballots, and so forth, freedoms at the collective levels have a clear universality to them that goes beyond the specifics of the liberal philosophy. Among other races with other evolutionary strategies and, perhaps, more naturalistic political systems, those freedoms may even be sufficient unto the day. The individual’s needs may be met in the main elsewhere, by non-political culture and religion. But the European evolutionary strategy of individuality injects a different energy at the level of the individual. It accentuates the value of the individual life, and imbues our truths and meanings. It cannot be contained, but bursts forth as the political. It is no small part of what we are. Its action in us is responsible for the whole of the liberal analytic since its mid-17th century inception.
Some say 200 drones, some say 300. But however large it was no one can say that Iran’s attack on Israel last night was provoked by the CIA. Or Nuland. Or Biden. Which is a relief. One injured girl is said to be the cost to the Israelis. The Iron Dome worked brilliantly well, although it was not faced with Iran’s ballistic missiles. Netanyahu, having said only yesterday that Israel will reach out and hurt those who hurt Israel, can now justly say that the hurt is not what it might have been, and leave it there. For its part, the Iranian government has said that honour will be satisfied by the one attack, which follows Israel’s strikes on Iran’s consulate in Syria a fortnight ago. That latter killed eleven people, including Mohammad Reza Zahedi, who was the General in command of Iran’s elite al-Quds force and in charge of Iran’s network of proxy militias in Lebanon and Syria. The militias can now reflect on the, of course, great honour of their patrons in Tehran, and tell themselves that Allah’s will has been done. Assuming the Israelis don’t feel the need to make a point, there is no advantage to anyone at this point in escalation. But a line has been crossed. For the first time Tehran has attacked the hated Israelis from its own soil. It has also learned that to be anything more than a nuisance a missile attack must be ballistic. The quiet which should now obtain will be uneasy. Israel will not be restrained from targeting Iranians in Syria, because they see that as self-defence. There would be little point for Tehran in responding to another death like Zahedi’s with a few hundred pin-pricks. But a ballistic response, if it gets through, would mean outright war with every possibility of America being dragged in. That’s more or less where we are this morning. The world of nations is slowly assorting itself into two camps broadly interested in, on the one hand, a world of rules, global corporations and money and, on the other, a world of force and empire. One might conclude that one side now consists principally of Poland, France, Germany, the United Kingdom, the Baltic States, the Czech Republic, Holland, Finland, Norway, Sweden, Italy, Spain, Australia, Canada, Saudi, Israel, Japan, South Korea. The other side consists of Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, North Korea, China, Iran and its various proxies, South Africa, and, in the west, Slovakia and Hungary. Not yet forced to choose, or likely to remain as much as possible on the sidelines, are Trump’s America, India, Brazil, and Turkey. I would certainly contend that this grand divide is now the principal geopolitical framework, and nationalists like ourselves are going to have to adjust to this reality. As I wrote earlier, in a more limited context of the western elite’s drive for The Globality:
It is clear that our elite class committed the sin of assuming they had won, and their desired goal was historically inevitable. They lost all interest in nationhood, and therefore in the defence of the nation, thirty-five years ago. Now their project is failing. There are signs everywhere. But the contempt they displayed towards us … the decay they have wrought upon us mere economic men, mere racists and moral dross … has gone too far, and leaves them without a fighting tradition, a unified and motivated people, to call upon. This can bring opportunity for nationalism if a point of balance is reached whereby the elites’ many-sided assault on the European life is undermined by history, and the national principle and the native principle are even grudgingly respected (because only these can confront eastern force). In other words, the west must survive but not Davos, and the east must not come to us in any shape or form, be it by geopolitics or military action or colonisation. So, Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan; the three unlikely pillars of western security. Do nationalists want to defend them or desert them?
|
|
![]() Existential IssuesDNA NationsCategoriesContributorsLinksMR Central & News |